Critical dialectical language exposes contradiction while Orwellian language hides it

Evidence

Such dialectical relation of opposites in and by the proposition is rendered possible by the recognition of the subject as an historical agent whose identity constitutes itself in and against its historical practice, in and against its social reality. The discourse develops and states the conflict between the thing and its function, and this conflict finds linguistic expression in sentences which join contradictory predicates in a logical unit—conceptual counterpart of the objective reality. In contrast to all Orwellian language, the contradiction is demonstrated, made explicit, explained, and denounced. — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man, 411

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly contrasts with Orwell’s Newspeak and the whole 1984 thematic of controlled language; also connects to the reader’s knowledge of ‘We’ by Zamyatin. — connects to: Dialectical prose demands every proposition be equally close to the centre — Theodor W. Adorno, Minima Moralia: Reflections from…, 83; Contradiction has become the operating principle of manipulative discourse — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the…, 387; Dialectics attend to what is not immediately visible, whereas immediacy erases contradiction — Anna Kornbluh, Immediacy, or The Style of Too Late…, 326 (+5 more)
  • DEFINE: Defines the dialectical language that joins contradictory predicates as opposed to authoritarian closure.

Broader Connections