Convivial relations carry radical openness that undermines fixed and reified identity.

Evidence

Thus, for Gilroy, convivial relations are ‘alive’ with a ‘radical openness that […] makes a nonsense of closed, fixed, and reified identity and turns attention toward the always-unpredictable mechanisms of identification.’ (2004, xi). — Farhan Samanani, Conviviality and its others, 23

Categorization

  • XREF: Gilroy’s emancipatory hopefulness about ordinary cohabitation echoes across ‘The Reluctant Fundamentalist’ themes of identity fluidity under pressure. — connects to: Identity is constructed through opposition to a continuously reinterpreted other; Without destruction of prior form, identity cannot sustain itself. — Catherine Malabou, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, 245; Mainstream conviviality theory assumes negotiation dissolves fixed identities — Farhan Samanani, Conviviality and its others: for a…, 21 (+4 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Farhan Samanani, Conviviality and its others: for a…, 23

Broader Connections