Contemporary meanings of Islam are framed by atavistic historical precedents

Evidence

Signification therefore operates on two levels: the level of denotation where consensus of meaning exists, and connotation where meaning connects to broader historical, socio-economic, cultural, religious and other meanings. Thus the hijab was given meaning to via the religion of Islam and understandings of Muslim women, both of which had various discourses and meanings already attributed to them, albeit real or constructed. When the hijab was thus acknowledged as a signifier for both Islam and Muslim women therefore, so it made known and reinforced and reinvigorated those pre-existent meanings already associated with both of these entities at the same time as embodying and being further enhanced by the contemporary and fast emerging meanings, discourses and so on of the time. So whilst Muslims may contemporarily be given meaning through violence, terrorism and atrocity, particularly in the context of 9/11, such events and associated meanings would simultaneously link into and be contextualised by the atavistic meanings of Islam and Muslims that have been common currency historically. not only does this undermine the repudiation of the power of history theory but it adds credence to Halliday’s observation that history acts as a frame of reference for the present day. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 756

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly engages Halliday’s claim that history frames the present — one of the rival definitional positions in this module. — connects to: Islam symbolized lasting trauma and danger, so its representation tamed it for Europe; The concept of Islam as a unified system supersedes actual Muslim experience; French discourse equated Muslim with fanatic for centuries — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 244 (+14 more)

Broader Connections