Constitutional violations are deemed acceptable when targeting Islam or Muslims.

Evidence

While this legislation conflicts with the First Amendment’s principle of separating church and state and preventing the states from meddling in the religious affairs of their citizenry, the ferocity of Islamophobia in America today, at both the federal and state levels, reveals that there is always an Islamophobic exception: violating core constitutional principles is deemed justifiable or permissible as long as the target is Islam or Muslims. — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 310

Categorization

  • DEFINE: This names the ‘Islamophobic exception’ mechanism — a key part of the book’s working vocabulary.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 310
  • XREF: connects to: Routine Muslim religious practice is legally treated as evidence of terrorist predisposition — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 463; Terrorist designations function as tools to criminalize Muslim civic participation. — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global…, 665; Muslim bodies are treated as potential terrorists until proven otherwise — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 282 (+10 more)

Broader Connections