Conspiracy theories become unfalsifiable by dismissing skeptic evidence as planted

Evidence

Conspiracists fi nd themselves in much the same dilemma as the apocalyptic authors. The logic of their narrative carries them to the edge of despair even as they yearn for a millennial outcome. Their problem is exacerbated by the fact that they often become so intent on elaborating descriptions of the conspiracy that they end up with an adversary who cannot be defeated. — Michael Barkun, A Culture of Conspiracy, 1070 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Pynchon’s compact novel is a primer in semiotics, paranoia, and the limits of interpretation. Every signifier branches into recursive ambiguity. Its method is paranoid hermeneutics played for comedy. Lot 49 anticipates the COMM concerns of platform-era information environments: conspiracy as alternative epistemology, communication networks as power, and the impossibility of decoding without ideological commitment. — , The Braided Reading EPUB, 105 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source
  • XREF: connects to: Conspiracy worldviews rest on three design principles excluding randomness — Michael Barkun, A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic…, 74; Over-elaborating a conspiracy produces an undefeatable adversary — Michael Barkun, A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic…, 1070; Inclusive conspiracies become unfalsifiable since all outside sources are complicit (+20 more)

Broader Connections