Commercial law developed before states enforced contracts at scale.

Evidence

Prior to the revival of trade in the early middle ages, few institutions underpinned commercial activity; there was no state to enforce contracts, let alone to protect merchants from pirates and brigands. In contrast, modern Western economies possess highly specialized systems of enforcing contracts and protecting merchants, resulting in widespread geographic specialization and impersonal exchange. The story of this evolution has been told elsewhere (e.g., Lopez, 1976; North and Thomas, 1973). Our purpose in this section is to suggest the outlines of an important step in this evolution, namely the early development of commercial law prior to the rise of large-scale third-party enforcement of legal codes by the nation-state. — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 22

Categorization

  • SHARE: A precise historical-economics nugget for anyone interested in the origins of contract enforcement — the claim that merchant self-governance predated state law is a good conversation point.
  • QUESTION: Worth chasing: what were the actual institutions of this pre-state commercial law enforcement — did medieval merchant guilds or judges of fairs fill this role, and how did they sanction defaulters?
  • XREF: connects to: Medieval merchants developed private commercial law without state enforcement — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 8; Industrialization required pre-existing commercial, legal, and financial infrastructure.; Legal innovations follow new commercial practices as they arise. — PAUL R. MILGRO, PAUL R. MILGRO - THE ROLE OF…, 33 (+4 more)

Broader Connections