Colonized populations reject imperial medicine not from ignorance but as political resistance.

Evidence

Frantz Fanon tells how modern medical techniques, when they were brought in by imperialism, were resisted and rejected by the Algerian population—“ignorant, obstinate, backward” according to the cultured imperialists who were baffled by this rejection. But these same techniques were accepted with dizzying haste when the revolution adopted them. Culture, like truth, is concrete. And for the masses the most elevated form of culture, that is to say, of progress, is to resist imperialist domination and penetration, although this might come wrapped up in valid forms of “culture” or “civilization.” The Algerians kept their women behind veils, rejected the doctors, would not accept the radio. But they were not backward. In their way, they were defending civilization as well as they were able. Civilization, for them, meant first of all to resist imperialism and second to cast it into the sea at whatever cost. And they were right. — Frantz Fanon, A Dying Colonialism, 24

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly connects to the reader’s central research question about how colonial permeation of medicine causally affected Algerians — colonized and French alike. — connects to: Algerians rejected colonial medicine not from ignorance but as resistance; Colonized peoples reject foreign medicine as an instrument of exploitation; Colonial domination itself, not tradition, shapes native resistance to medicine (+6 more)
  • DEFINE: Defines the mechanism of ‘dying in coloniality’: rejection of colonial medical care is political self-defense, not backwardness.

Broader Connections