Colonial medical techniques were rejected until the revolution reappropriated them

Evidence

There was no paternalism; there was no timidity. On the contrary, a concerted effort was made to achieve the health plan that had been worked out. The health technician did not launch a “psychological approach program for the purpose of winning over the underdeveloped population.” The problem was, under the direction of the national authority, to supervise the people’s health, to protect the lives of our women, of our children, of our combatants. — Frantz Fanon, A Dying Colonialism, 451 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

In all objectivity and in all humanity, it is a good thing that a technically advanced country benefits from its knowledge and the discoveries of its scientists. When the discipline considered concerns man’s health, when its very principle is to ease pain, it is clear that no negative reaction can be justified. But the colonial situation is precisely such that it drives the colonized to appraise all the colonizer’s contributions in a pejorative and absolute way. — Frantz Fanon, A Dying Colonialism, 396 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Colonized peoples reject foreign medicine as an instrument of exploitation; Revolutionary medicine rejected the paternalist methods of colonial health programs — Frantz Fanon, A Dying Colonialism, 451; Revolutionary health programs succeeded where colonial medical campaigns had failed (+6 more)

Broader Connections