Colonized hospitalization refusal stems from anti-colonial resistance, not rural superstition.

Evidence

It would be a serious mistake, and it would in any case make such an attitude incomprehensible, to compare such behavior with that already described as characterizing the poor rural populations of European countries. The colonized who resisted hospitalization did not do so on the basis of the fear of cities, the fear of distance, of no longer being protected by the family, the fear that people would say that the patient had been sent to the hospital to die, that the family had rid itself of a burden. The colonized not only refused to send the patient to the hospital, but he refused to send him to the hospital of the whites, of strangers, of the conqueror. — Frantz Fanon, A Dying Colonialism, 407

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly answers the reader’s question about how coloniality permeates medicine — the refusal is political, not folk-medical. — connects to: Colonial domination itself, not tradition, shapes native resistance to medicine; Colonized populations reject imperial medicine not from ignorance but as political resistance. — Frantz Fanon, A Dying Colonialism, 24; Colonized peoples reject foreign medicine as an instrument of exploitation (+3 more)

Broader Connections