Colonial development rhetoric masked systematic resource extraction from native lands.

Evidence

The natives … far from owning the natural resources their lands contained, or the intellectual resources their psyches generated, were fated to have their labour and energies used in the extraction of wealth from their lands for the construction of European industry. Native participation in this massive program of spoliation was called development. (Armah, 2006, p. 45) It is quite telling that having commanded foundational import in both the enslavement and colonization of Africa, the myths about African lethargy should now be given a new lease of life in the 21st century. — Tavengwa Gwekwerere, Davie E. Mutasa, and Kudakwashe Chitofiri, Settlers, Rhodesians, and Supremacists, 78

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: A dense, corrosive observation that ‘development’ named the very program of dispossession — refusing the humanitarian gloss Europeans put on colonization.
  • ADDENDUM: Connects to the reader’s grievance-circuit test: the ‘development’ justification is the ideological infrastructure these Rhodesian authors inherit and redeploy against post-2000 Zimbabwe.
  • XREF: connects to: Irish land dispossession paralleled African colonial land theft in scale — Noel Ignatiev, How the Irish Became White, 128; Colonialism systematically dispossesses the colonized of resources under a justifying discourse of hierarchy — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 246; Colonial development rhetoric served to extract maximum labor from Africans — Alice L. Conklin, A Mission to Civilize_ The Republican…, 196 (+6 more)

Broader Connections