Colonial classifications imposed race categories that subjects never recognized as their own

Evidence

If the Cirebonese account only had survived, we would know the accused murderer as a high official of the Cirebonese court, and only by his title Ki Aria Marta Ningrat, not a personal name. The VOC records, however, angrily identify him as a Chinees – indeed that is the single most important piece of information about him that they convey. It is clear then that the Cirebonese court classified people by rank and status, while the Company did so by something like ‘race.’ There is no reason whatever to think that the accused murderer – whose high status attests to his and his ancestors’ long integration into Cirebonese society, no matter what their origins – thought of himself as ‘a’ Chinees. — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, 650

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the colonial construction of the ‘Other’ through classification — a foundational concept the reader’s Islamophobia toolkit needs, parallel to Fanon’s colonial psychology of imposed identity. — connects to: Eighteenth-century classification reduced heterogeneous peoples to orderable types; Colonial classification suppressed internal diversity under one inaccurate label; Colonial category of the native stopped at each colony’s drawn boundary. — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on…, 462 (+21 more)
  • QUESTION: What does it mean for identification that the accused would not have recognized himself as ‘a Chinees’ — does the reader’s own earlier note on expatriates acting out assigned roles echo this?

Broader Connections