Colonial cartography created nations whose borders match neither history nor language.

Evidence

I use this perhaps clumsy terminology to emphasize the colonial origins of these entities. ‘Laos’ was assembled out of a cluster of rival principalities, leaving more than half of the Lao-speaking population in Siam. The boundaries of ‘Cambodge’ conformed neither to any particular historical stretch of the precolonial realm, nor to the distribution of the Khmer-speaking peoples. Some hundreds of thousands of such people ended up trapped in ‘Cochin China,’ producing in time that distinct community known as the Khmer Krom (down-river Khmer). — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities, 507

Categorization

  • DEFINE: The quoted scare-quotes mark ‘Laos’ and ‘Cambodge’ as colonial fabrications — a definitional move showing how nation-as-colonial-artifact works.
  • XREF: The Khmer Krom as a people created by border-drawing parallels how colonial partition produced stateless or minoritized communities — a mechanism the Islamophobia field’s focus on colonial cartography and national exclusion builds on. — connects to: Colonial category of the native stopped at each colony’s drawn boundary. — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on…, 462; Colonial classifications imposed race categories that subjects never recognized as their own — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on…, 650; Colonial historiography inherited administrative map distinctions its practice violated (+5 more)

Broader Connections