Clients and workers inhabit structurally incompatible frames of individual need versus aggregate processing

Evidence

Clients tend to experience their needs as individual problems and their demands as individual expressions of expectations and grievances. They often expect treatment appropriate to them as individuals, and are in large measure encouraged in this expectation by public institutions and society in general. On the other hand, street-level bureaucrats experience client problems as calls for categories of action. Individual client demands are perceived as components of aggregates. Expectations of proper treatment are framed in terms of satisfactory solutions for the optimal processing of the totality of the work rather than in terms of the best solution for individual cases. Clients seek services and benefits; street-level bureaucrats seek control over the process of providing them. β€” Michael Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy, 459

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s library on how institutions impose categorical frames, e.g., modern bureaucracy and epistemic-archival work in Along the Archival Grain. β€” connects to: Formal fairness rules cannot dictate concern levels, so workers apply personal deservingness judgments β€” Michael Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of…, 212; Triage designates clients by who can best use limited resources, not worst need β€” Michael Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of…, 777; Client deference is a pervasive precondition of frontline service delivery β€” Michael Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of…, 269 (+9 more)

Broader Connections