Citizenship’s static territorial model excludes those who move
Evidence
The modernist sense of citizenship is stat-ic, at basis immobile. It also, in a sense, bristles at its borders, antagonistically excluding those taken not to belong, not already a member. By contrast, lam asking with John Urry (2000: 167
#f.) what a conception of citizenship (and by extension the state) ~ of civic engagement and commitment, interests and investments, powers and responsibilities - would amount to if taking as first principles social flow and flexibilities, mobilities and movements, transformativity and transition. — David Theo Goldberg, The Racial State, 142
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Seasonal territory asserted by migrating birds overrides documented human ownership — Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac: With Other…, 134; Citizenship is decoupling from nation-state boundaries under globalization — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 835
Related
- Classic citizenship privileges settlement and frames mobility as exceptional (similarity 0.85)
- Citizenship is decoupling from nation-state boundaries under globalization (similarity 0.81)
- Recent migration politics center on who belongs as citizens. (similarity 0.80)