Classic citizenship privileges settlement and frames mobility as exceptional
Evidence
This classic conception of citizenship (what | have characterized as the modernist one) is predicated on stasis and state territorial sovereignty, on borders and interiorized burghers, spatial fixity and introspection. The modernist sense of citizenship is stat-ic, at basis immobile. It also, in a sense, bristles at its borders, antagonistically excluding those taken not to belong, not already a member. — David Theo Goldberg, The Racial State, 142
Related
- Citizenship’s static territorial model excludes those who move (similarity 0.85)
- Citizenship is evolving toward multiple simultaneous levels beyond the nation-state (similarity 0.82)
- Citizenship is decoupling from nation-state boundaries under globalization (similarity 0.81)
- Citizenship is decoupling from the nation-state as political and cultural borders diverge. (similarity 0.81)
- Race-based inequalities make citizenship questions urgent in heterogeneous states (similarity 0.81)
- Citizenship cannot be understood apart from nation-state, democracy, capitalism, and class (similarity 0.80)
- Modern citizenship has become juridically fused with national identity (similarity 0.80)
- Global migration drives the decoupling of formal and substantial citizenship (similarity 0.80)
- Recent migration politics center on who belongs as citizens. (similarity 0.79)