Citizen surveillance targets hijab-wearing women publicly but men privately as suspected terrorists

Evidence

Just like state surveillance, Muslim surveillance by private citizens is gendered. Muslim women and Muslim men are subjected to surveillance for different reasons. Muslim American women who wear the hijab have their nationalities contested in very public ways, while Muslim American men are questioned through interactions with private citizens at work, school, or social gatherings when their identity as Muslim is made known. Women who wear the hijab are targets for public contestation because of the visibility of their religious identity. They have their cultural values questioned because of their choice to cover their hair. Their fellow citizens consider actions like wearing the hijab a foreign cultural threat to Western values. Muslim men are pigeonholed as potential terrorists once their religious identity is known. — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 347

Categorization

  • XREF: Echoes the gendered-surveillance distinction in the reading notes and connects to broader literature on differential racialization by gender. — connects to: Airport surveillance differentially targets men via lists and hijab-wearing women via physical searches — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 70; Private citizens surveil hijab-wearing women and challenge their American identity — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 77; Private citizens surveil Muslim women for cultural transgression and men for security threats — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 107 (+12 more)
  • recurring: this claim recurs 5 times within its source

Broader Connections