Christian annotators charged the Quran with self-contradiction on points later seen as mere nuance

Evidence

If thou art not a coercer, but a teacher, why dost thou subject men by power, like animals and brute beasts, and not by reasoning, like men? In fact, like the liar you are, you everywhere contradict yourself.’ This early statement, while it emphasised the accusation of self-contradiction which many writers would bring forward, introduced also the assertion, equally popular, that Muhammad did not, and Islam would not, allow rational disputation. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 695 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

San Pedro’s account of the miracles of Christ in the Qur’an suggests an appreciative sense of the marvellous: ‘whatever Jesus Christ said, instantly it was so’ - this ‘Muhammad said, and has written in his Qur’an’; but he strongly attacked the Christology of the Qur’an as inconsistent. It made Jesus out to be a man, and yet not to die; made Him holy and sinless, yet supposed that He would allow another to die in His place; made out, in fact, that He was born by the power of God, only to deceive men by this false crucifixion, in a world already full of deceivers. San Pedro was oppressed by the thought of so many lies, of such great heresies in the Qur’an and in the sayings of Muhammad which his followers had collected (hadith); by the thought of the loss of souls of those who died Muslims. — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 950 (#expands, via linked claim)

The Contrarietas has a perversion of the Qur’anic text here. For ‘it is /awful for you 
 to go unto your wives’ it has ‘estote solicitt ut impregnetis mulzeres’ (Q. 11.183; Cont. 1x). — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 2364 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Medieval Christian polemicists built their case on Muhammad’s alleged self-contradiction — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 695; Medieval polemicists distorted Quranic verses to serve anti-Muslim arguments — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 2364; Medieval Christian polemicists attacked the Qur’an’s Christology as internally inconsistent — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 950

Broader Connections