Challe offensive losses fueled a hardliner coup within F.L.N. leadership

Evidence

In a defensive statement Krim admitted that the previous month’s fighting had been “the hardest of the war”, and that the A.L.N. of the “interior” had suffered heavy losses. He then came under fierce attack for failing to supply it with arms and reinforcements, and was criticised for being, though an excellent commander in the field, no chief-of-staff. The fact that his attackers included those who previously had been his loyal supporters made Krim seem increasingly isolated. At the centre of the attack appeared Boussouf, described by Claude Paillat as become “the Fouché of the rebellion, but a revolutionary Fouché like Saint-Just, and provided with troops like Napoleon”. Behind Boussouf, and strongly backed by his powerful patron, stood the silent and reflective figure of Boumedienne; a new force to be reckoned with, he emerged as the focal point of what were henceforth to be recognised as the hard-liners, the guerre à outrance faction of the F.L.N. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 1171

Categorization

  • XREF: The Paillat description directly invokes the French Revolutionary comparison (Fouché and Saint-Just) the reader is tracking — the revolution devouring its own via radical ascension. — connects to: French offensives shattered the F.L.N.’s interior command-and-control network by 1959; The F.L.N. hard-line reshuffle doomed de Gaulle’s ‘association’ option; F.L.N. leadership regrouped in Tunis after losing Algiers to the French. (+6 more)

Broader Connections