Caesarist forms must be read individually, not as rigid schemata
Related
- Specific meaning arises only from an arbitrary contingent break (similarity 0.86)
- Caesarism is a compromise between fundamental social forces, distinct from Bonapartism. (similarity 0.86)
- Historical change forces theorists to invent new, more concrete concepts (similarity 0.84)
- Abolished theoretical concepts recurrently return in reconfigured forms. (similarity 0.83)
- Stuart Hall regarded 1956’s Suez and Hungary crises as pivotal for him (similarity 0.83)
- Colin McGinn argues consciousness is a mystery that human intelligence will never unravel, as the hard problem of qualia cannot be resolved by humans. (similarity 0.83)
- Information content is defined by surprise or improbability, not repetition (similarity 0.83)
- Ideologues claiming the key to reality must adapt to every new event (similarity 0.83)
- The dialectic is the marrow of historiography and political science, not formal logic. (similarity 0.82)
- So-what sentence drafted (similarity 0.82)
- Sinn precedes meaning as the horizon of possibilities (similarity 0.82)
- Gramsci’s core concepts work as opposed but dialectically united pairs (similarity 0.82)
- Cultural meaning shifts with the social field it enters (similarity 0.82)
- Discourses form coherent wholes through interlocking statements sharing strategy (similarity 0.82)
- Critical work advances dialogically and never reaches stable theoretical ground. (similarity 0.82)