Caesarism is a compromise between fundamental social forces, distinct from Bonapartism.
Related
- Caesarism arises from a class-equilibrium that blocks normal parliamentary politics (similarity 0.88)
- Caesarist forms must be read individually, not as rigid schemata (similarity 0.86)
- Caesarism can serve either progressive or reactionary forces depending on concrete history (similarity 0.82)
- Caesar’s and Napoleon I’s Caesarism was transformative; Napoleon III’s was merely quantitative (similarity 0.81)
- Caesarism emerges when two forces reach an organic equilibrium neither can win (similarity 0.81)
- European plutocrats tried to reconcile anachronistic demographics with ultra-modern production. (similarity 0.80)
- Socialism became the banner of petit-bourgeois members appalled by capitalism (similarity 0.80)
- Hegemony must be won before power is seized, not merely imposed by force after (similarity 0.80)
- Social stability must never come at the cost of necessary change or social justice (similarity 0.80)
- Historical change forces theorists to invent new, more concrete concepts (similarity 0.80)
- Totalitarianism adopted tribalism for its isolating value even against its own doctrines (similarity 0.80)
- Totalitarian ideology becomes as untouchable as arithmetic to members. (similarity 0.80)
- Machiavelli wrote to give political education to those not born into ruling traditions (similarity 0.79)
- Economic success built on coercion may collapse when rule liberalizes (similarity 0.79)
- Marx criticized Feuerbach for separating theory from practice (similarity 0.79)