Experimental method determines what discrepancies listeners can perceive
Related
- Différance produces meaning through a weave of differences, not binaries (similarity 0.82)
- Information content is defined by surprise or improbability, not repetition (similarity 0.81)
- Trained listener panels differ systematically from the general audience (similarity 0.81)
- Dissonance cannot be fully quantified because it is a subjective human impression (similarity 0.81)
- Specific meaning arises only from an arbitrary contingent break (similarity 0.80)
- Loop-switched comparisons give more revealing loudspeaker evaluations than real-time switching (similarity 0.80)
- Detecting changes in auditory textures depends mainly on integration time available (similarity 0.79)
- Trust is merely evidence-based expectation while trustworthiness is motivational (similarity 0.79)
- Trust necessarily stays moored in expectations and interests (similarity 0.79)
- Repeated exposure makes a second sentence intrinsically more intelligible than the first (similarity 0.79)
- A late complication forces the reader to reconsider the earlier resolution. (similarity 0.78)
- Representation and misrepresentation differ only by degree within a shared field of discourse. (similarity 0.78)
- Hearing thresholds vary individually but share a common perceptual order (similarity 0.78)
- Measurable and audible sound qualities can be shown to correlate reliably (similarity 0.78)
- Caesarist forms must be read individually, not as rigid schemata (similarity 0.78)