Economic success built on coercion may collapse when rule liberalizes
Related
- The liberal state, defined by economic individualism, generates monopoly concentration on its own. (similarity 0.83)
- Juridico-political ideology masks the economic’s determinant role under capitalism (similarity 0.82)
- Commerce requires liberty, contract security, trust, and justice (similarity 0.82)
- Economism reduces social formations to a single line of economic determination (similarity 0.81)
- The sphere of exchange generates capitalism’s spontaneous commonsense and bourgeois theory (similarity 0.81)
- Early cotton schemes avoided coercion but collapsed when Africans refused (similarity 0.80)
- State weakness cannot explain the mafia’s emergence (similarity 0.80)
- Marx broke with political economy by abstracting structures apart from individuals (similarity 0.80)
- Economic determination acts by setting limits rather than predicting specific outcomes (similarity 0.80)
- Cohesion and trust check government power, not merely establish social order (similarity 0.80)
- Economic gains could not restore legitimacy once consent to coercion collapsed (similarity 0.79)
- Caesarism is a compromise between fundamental social forces, distinct from Bonapartism. (similarity 0.79)
- Social stability must never come at the cost of necessary change or social justice (similarity 0.79)
- Totalitarian ideology becomes as untouchable as arithmetic to members. (similarity 0.79)
- Cooperation-focused strategies fail where conditions for cooperation are themselves absent (similarity 0.78)