Bureaucracy’s essence is dissociating means from moral evaluation of ends

Evidence

Use of violence is most efficient and cost-effective when the means are subjected to solely instrumental-rational criteria, and thus dissociated from moral evaluation of the ends. As I pointed out in the first chapter, such dissociation is an operation all bureaucracies are good at. One may even say that it provides the essence of bureaucratic structure and process, and with it the secret of that tremendous growth of moblizing and co-ordinating potential, and of the rationality and efficiency of action, which modern civilization has achieved thanks to the development of bureaucratic administration. The dissociation is by and large and outcome of two parallel processes, which are both central to the bureaucratic model of action. The first is the meticulous functional division of labour (as additional to, and distinct in its consequences, from linear graduation of power and subordination); the second is the substitution of technical for a moral responsibility. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 289

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Core mechanism for the reader’s toolkit: the two bureaucratic components (functional division of labour; technical substituting for moral responsibility) that enable mass exclusion without individual moral responsibility.
  • XREF: Directly builds the bridge to later Islamophobia readings on how bureaucratized immigration/asylum systems effect exclusion through technical, de-moralized procedures. — connects to: Inefficient parliamentarianism does not justify praising bureaucracy; Rational bureaucracy rendered murder morally neutral in perpetrators’ eyes. — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 691; Bureaucratic desk work destroys people while hiding causal links from actors — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 97 (+10 more)

Broader Connections