British occupation displaced Ottoman authority and severed Egypt from its dependency the Sudan

Evidence

The chapter concludes with the ways in which Sudanese figures debated the issue of unity with Egypt under the watchful eyes of British administrators in the Sudan, and a discussion of how the dualism of the colonized colonizer was viewed by people in the Sudan, nominally colonized by both Great Britain and Egypt. — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 121 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Egypt faced triangular colonialism from Ottoman, British, and Sudanese forces; Egypt’s informal British occupation contrasted with its formal 1821 colonial rule over the Sudan; Britain occupied Egypt while the Mahdï seized the Sudan in 1882-83 (+14 more)

Related

• Britain occupied Egypt while the Mahdï seized the Sudan in 1882-83 (similarity 0.92)
• British rule in Egypt was informal while its invasion of the Sudan was direct. (similarity 0.90)
• Egypt’s informal British occupation contrasted with its formal 1821 colonial rule over the Sudan (similarity 0.89)
• Egypt simultaneously became a British colony and lost its own Sudanese colony in 1884 (similarity 0.88)
• Egypt was crushed between Ottoman decline, British occupation, and Sudanese uprising (similarity 0.88)
• A Sudan rebellion coincided with the British occupation of Egypt in 1884 (similarity 0.88)
• British colonial strategy drove a wedge between Sudanese and Egyptians (similarity 0.87)
• Egypt ran its own colonial empire in Sudan from 1821 to 1884 (similarity 0.87)
• Milner argued Sudan was never genuinely subdued by or amalgamated with Egypt (similarity 0.85)
• Egypt was simultaneously a British colony and a colonizer of Sudan. (similarity 0.84)
• Slavery and control of Sudan were inextricably linked in Egyptian and British views. (similarity 0.84)
• Isma’il’s Sudan expansion debts caused Egypt’s foreign control and British occupation (similarity 0.84)
• Egypt faced triple colonial pressure from Ottomans, British, and Mahdist Sudan (similarity 0.84)
• Egypt was simultaneously colonized by Britain and eager to recolonize the Sudan. (similarity 0.84)
• Egypt’s informal British occupation preceded the reconquest of Sudan by sixteen years (similarity 0.83)

Broader Connections

• Egypt’s informal British occupation contrasted with its formal 1821 colonial rule over the Sudan #expands (0.80)
• Britain occupied Egypt while the Mahdï seized the Sudan in 1882-83 #corroborates (0.70)
• Egypt was simultaneously a British colony and a colonizer of Sudan. #corroborates (0.70) — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 121
• Egypt functioned simultaneously as colonized and colonizer of Sudan #corroborates (0.70) — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 527
• British rule in Egypt was informal while its invasion of the Sudan was direct. #expands (0.70)
• Egypt ran its own colonial empire in Sudan from 1821 to 1884 #corroborates (0.70)
• British colonial strategy drove a wedge between Sudanese and Egyptians #expands (0.60)
• The Ottoman collapse removed a nominal counterweight to Egyptian dependence on Britain #corroborates (0.60)
• Egypt simultaneously became a British colony and lost its own Sudanese colony in 1884 #corroborates (0.60)
• Egyptian rule over Sudan constituted a mini-empire within the Ottoman framework #expands (0.60)
• Milner argued Sudan was never genuinely subdued by or amalgamated with Egypt #expands (0.50)
• Britain backed the Sultan only on condition Egypt declared independence. #expands (0.40)