Audiences bring their own cultures to consumption, so media effects are never automatic

Evidence

In this retrospective assessment of Hoggart’s contribution to the field, Stuart notes how very much of Cultural Studies’ later critique of simplistic Marxism (especially the dismissal of working-class cultures as being marred by “false consciousness”) is rooted in Hoggart’s insistence that such cultures, however flawed, have their own internal logics. As he points out, this means that the cultural industries cannot be assumed to have automatic effects—as their audiences bring cultures and values of their own to the moment of consumption. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 122

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Grounds the later model of ‘negotiated’ decoding in Hoggart’s earlier premise that working-class cultures have internal logics.
  • XREF: Connects directly to Hall’s later theory of negotiated/oppositional decoding of media, plus the explanatory function of ‘authoritarian populism’ in Thatcherism’s success. — connects to: Popular culture is a contested site of consent and resistance, not pure authenticity; Television production is not a closed system but draws from wider society; Viewing mass-culture consumers as passive dupes is an unsocialist position (+10 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 122

Broader Connections