Attachment to country is one component of national identification

Evidence

Identification with the national group is defined in this literature as feelings of attachment to one’s group (Doosje et al., 2004) and is measured with items such as “I identify with other (name of group members),” “(name of group) is an important group to me,” and “Being an (name of group) is an important part of how I see myself at this moment” (Doosje et al., 1998). — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt, 24

Categorization

• DEFINE: Establishes the baseline conflation the reader’s research seeks to split apart: identification is defined and measured purely as attachment.
• XREF: connects to: Attachment and glorification are distinct facets of national identification. — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt: Modes…, 142; National attachment and glorification are independent modes of identification. — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt: Modes…, 40; Patriotism and nationalism are distinct dimensions of group identification with opposing effects — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 2113

Related

• Attachment and glorification are distinct facets of national identification. (similarity 0.93)
• National attachment and glorification are independent modes of identification. (similarity 0.92)
• Attachment and glorification positively correlate as shared group identification. (similarity 0.88)
• Glorification and attachment separately predict reactions to national misdeeds (similarity 0.87)
• Attachment and glorification form two distinct latent factors (similarity 0.84)
• Patriotism and nationalism are distinct dimensions of group identification with opposing effects (similarity 0.84)
• Glorification means national in-group superiority and deference to its symbols and rules. (similarity 0.84)
• Attachment to the in-group and glorification predict opposite reactions to one’s group’s moral violations. (similarity 0.82)
• High national identification requires a source of collective pride (similarity 0.82)
• Attachment can be experimentally induced toward an ideal rather than actual group (similarity 0.81)
• Group identification varies qualitatively across cultures, not just in degree (similarity 0.81)
• National glorification but not attachment blocks critical evaluation of ingroup wrongdoing. (similarity 0.80)
• Glorification predicts defensive denial of the in-group’s moral violations. (similarity 0.80)
• Group identification can both enable and block feelings of group-based guilt (similarity 0.79)
• In-group glorification drives justification of wrongdoings while attachment drives guilt (similarity 0.79)

Broader Connections

• Attachment and glorification are distinct facets of national identification. #expands (0.95) — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt, 142
• National attachment and glorification are independent modes of identification. #expands (0.90) — Sonia Roccas and Yechiel Klar and Ido Liviatan, The Paradox of Group-Based Guilt, 40
• Patriotism and nationalism are distinct dimensions of group identification with opposing effects #expands (0.85) — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 2113