Atlanta whites resisted desegregation less violently than northern whites did

Evidence

While this study sees more similarities than differences in the urban struggles of the North and South, it does find such differences. Unlike northern studies, which uncovered large amounts of “hidden violence” sparked by residential conflicts and chronicled a successful white resistance to racial change, this study demonstrates, almost counterintuitively, that whites in this segregated city were generally less violent in their resistance and less successful than their counterparts in the urban North. The relative failure of racists in Atlanta was not due to their lack of commitment to the cause, but because the black population they challenged was both larger and stronger than those in the North. — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight, 38

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Why would larger black populations suppress white violence rather than provoke it? The stated demographic explanation feels partial.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s framework on how desegregation pressure forces ideology into new forms; also reverses the common assumption of southern white supremacist violence. — connects to: White southerners largely complied with desegregation once defiance demonstrably failed — Matthew D. Lassiter, The Suburban Origins of “Color-Blind”…, 95; White resistance in transitioning Atlanta neighborhoods targeted institutions like schools and churches. — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 211; Large black populations made southern white resistance less violent but also less successful — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 38 (+6 more)

Broader Connections