Residential transition fractured white communities along proximity-based lines of flight versus fight.

Evidence

This intrawhite hostility stemmed from the fact that whites responded to residential transition in very different ways. When confronted with the fact—not simply the “threat”—of black homeowners in their neighborhoods, whites reacted according to their proximity to racial change. Almost without exception, those nearest the front lines of transition wanted to flee, while those further back wanted to fight. The inherent conflict in those two goals soon surfaced, and a supposedly solid “community” succumbed to bitter infighting. — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight, 210

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s broader project on how segregationist pressure fractures the apparent unity of a ‘community’ — parallels other case studies of white flight dynamics. — connects to: Housing fears proved the most emotionally charged white grievance for extremists to exploit. — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 104; Residential segregation was conceived as territorial defense of white islands against black encroachment — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 115; Competing white supremacist groups were rivals publicly but allies in neighborhood defense. — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 124 (+17 more)

Broader Connections