Atlanta’s larger black population drove faster residential racial change than in northern cities

Evidence

The relative failure of racists in Atlanta was not due to their lack of commitment to the cause, but because the black population they challenged was both larger and stronger than those in the North. In terms of percentages, Atlanta’s black population outpaced that of most northern cities: in 1940, for instance, blacks represented 35 percent of Atlanta’s population, but just 8 and 9 percent in Chicago and Detroit, respectively. By the 1970s, as the disparities in racial percentages narrowed, these metropolitan areas looked more alike—with black political power rising in the cities and conservative white suburbs growing around them. But the paths taken by northern and southern cities to that common destination had decidedly different origins. In cities of the postwar South, the larger demographic presence of African Americans meant that both the pressure for racial residential transition and the political clout of the black community were much stronger than in the North. As a result, southern whites were confronted with a pace of residential racial change that came much earlier, faster, and stronger than their northern counterparts. — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight, 38

Categorization

  • SEED: The 35 percent versus 8-9 percent black-share comparison is a powerful, concrete anchor for an essay on how demographic weight shapes both resistance strategy and political outcomes.
  • XREF: connects to: Postwar Atlanta’s housing squeeze forced black expansion into white transition neighborhoods — Kevin M. Kruse, White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of…, 105; Black residence shifted from southern rural areas to hyper-segregated northern cities — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 367; As black urbanization grew so did intra-city residential segregation (+3 more)

Broader Connections