Asymmetric violence plus segregated contact plausibly drives rejection of collective guilt

Evidence

These findings therefore suggest that rejection of collective guilt might be particularly prevalent in contexts where systematic episodes of asymmetric violence render plausible politicized ethnic hatred narratives and where opportunities to learn about out-group members’ experiences that contradict these narratives are chronically low. Andrighetto et al. (2012) have shown that for young adults in the highly segregated context of Kosovo, the crucial mechanism of learning about positive contact with and experiences of out-group members is intergenerational transmission. In their study, conducted on a sample of Kosovar Albanian students, knowledge about their parents’ high-quality contact with Serbs reduced their adherence to competitive victimhood beliefs. — Sandra Penic, Guy Elcheroth, and Dario Spini, When Is Collective Exposure to War…, 162

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects directly to the reading purpose: tests how directly-experienced conflict vs. structural context shapes guilt acceptance, echoing the collective-victimhood literature I’m surveying. — connects to: Collective guilt and shame drive conflict-attenuating behaviors, not just inner feelings. — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 366; Communal war exposure, not personal victimization, drives collective guilt acceptance — Sandra Penic, Guy Elcheroth, and Dario Spini, When Is Collective Exposure to War…, 2; Collective victimization typically suppresses acceptance of collective guilt — Sandra Penic, Guy Elcheroth, and Dario Spini, When Is Collective Exposure to War…, 8 (+7 more)

Broader Connections