Armed drone projects were framed as solving Vietnam’s political contradictions

Evidence

The drone was regarded as the low-cost weapon par excellence, in accordance with a double logic of economy, with respect to “the value of the human lives involved, and the financial costs” … The press, picking up on these arguments, regarded the projects for armed drones as the solution to the political contradictions of the Vietnam War: “The intensified bombings of North Vietnam since the beginning of the year has swelled the ranks of the more than 1600 American servicemen believed held prisoner in Indochina. Taking the pilots out of the bombers will remove a serious obstacle to the Nixon Administration’s avowed intension to maintain American air power in South Asia.” — Grégoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone, 765

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to reader’s interest in the ‘principle of impunity’ — eliminating pilot casualties removes the political cost that limited bombing. — connects to: Officers feared manhunting doctrine would echo Vietnam’s Phoenix Program.; The drone resolved a centuries-old contradiction in the theory of state sovereignty over war; Armed drones reshape sovereignty over a state’s own subjects, not just enemies (+3 more)
  • SEED: Angle: the drone as an answer to a domestic political constraint, not just a military innovation — killing without a constituency to lose.

Broader Connections