Drones lower political, economic, and ethical costs of war

Evidence

The main effect is to introduce a massive bias into his decision. Any agent who can take action with fewer risks to himself or his camp is likely to adopt a riskier pattern of behavior—that is to say, riskier for others. Similarly, the drone is a classic ā€œmoral hazardā€ā€”a situation in which being able to act without bearing the costs of the consequences relieves agents of responsibility for their decisions. — Grégoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone, 588 (#expands, via linked claim)

This citizenship of exposable lives has constituted an important—albeit not the sole—basis for a democratic critique of the power to wage war, not only in the institutional manner forecast by Kant, namely suffrage, but also as a vector of extraparliamentary mobilization in the antiwar movements of the twentieth century, However, the dronization of the armed forces, inasmuch as it reduces the military exposure of national lives to zero, tends to somewhat deactivate that critical attitude. It would nevertheless be a mistake to believe that an ā€œaversion to lossesā€ is the only possible motive and the cost/benefit calculation the only relevant rationality for the development of a critical voice in the face of state violence. — Grégoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone, 575 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim
  • XREF: connects to: Drone warfare creates a new ethical-political norm neither war nor peace; The discourse of ethical drones strategically lowers the cost of using them. — Grégoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone, 590; Low cost of drone warfare removes congressional restraint on military action (+18 more)

Broader Connections