Appearance of new spectral content is more salient than its removal in complex sound
Evidence
We chose to use an increment of the marginal distribution in two adjacent frequency bins on the basis that an appearance is more salient than its opposite in a complex acoustic stimulus (Constantino et al. 2012 ). — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 3285 (
#corroborates, via linked claim)
Categorization
Category: Factual Claims
Related
- An increasing sound appearance is more salient than a decreasing one in complex stimuli. (similarity 0.90)
- Adding sounds is perceptually more salient than removing them in complex stimuli (similarity 0.90)
- Added sound components are more detectable than removed ones in complex textures (similarity 0.86)
- Appearance of a change is more salient than its removal in complex acoustic stimuli (similarity 0.86)
- Acoustic increments are more salient than decrements in complex stimuli (similarity 0.83)
- Two kinds of sound change activate different processing features in hearing (similarity 0.79)
- Natural complex sounds make level changes easier to hear than pure tones do. (similarity 0.79)
- Listeners can detect changes in the probability statistics of continuous acoustic textures (similarity 0.79)
- The auditory system highlights spectral changes to help listeners compare sounds (similarity 0.78)
- Just-audible image displacement needs only 1 to 2 dB level change. (similarity 0.78)
Broader Connections
- Acoustic increments are more salient than decrements in complex stimuli
#corroborates(0.98) — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 3285