An insurgency’s victory can rest on preventing defeat, not winning battles

Evidence

“We can move out of one square to let you come in, in order that we may afterwards take two or three from one,” Paine wrote about the Americans. “You cannot be so insensible as not to see that we have two to one the advantage of you, because we conquer by a drawn game, and you lose by it.” Simply by avoiding “a total defeat,” Paine reasoned, the Americans could secure their independence because he “never could see any real disservice it would be to Britain.” As he viewed it, England was a nation of shopkeepers and merchants—a phrase used by Adam Smith in the 1776 edition of The Wealth of Nations—and, as Paine noted in this essay, “If an English merchant receives an order and is paid for it, it signifies nothing who governs the country.” Eventually those merchants and their representatives in Parliament would opt for peace and compel the king to agree, he implied. — Edward J. Larson, Declaring Independence, 352

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Documents the historical origin of the phrase ‘a nation of shopkeepers’ from Adam Smith’s 1776 Wealth of Nations.
  • SHARE: Worth sending to anyone who studies insurgency theory or asymmetric warfare.
  • XREF: connects to: Howe’s excessive caution at Bunker Hill cost him the decisive victory in 1776 — Edward J. Larson, Declaring Independence, 236; A militarily victorious counterinsurgency can still lose due to non-battlefield factors; French tactical victories could not win a prolonged elusive insurgency (+4 more)

Broader Connections