A thinker’s own thought must be separated from earlier material that only stimulated it

Evidence

The problem of the “origins” of Marx’s thought has not been properly considered: a detailed study of his philosophical culture (and of the general philosophical environment in which he was formed directly and indirectly) is certainly necessary, but only as the premiss for a far more important study, that of his own “original” philosophy, which cannot be exhausted by study of a few “sources” or his personal “culture”. It is necessary, first of all, to take account of his creative and constructive activity. — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 1378 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

The inner validity, coherence, and objective significance of all sciences, technologies, and arts are completely independent of the fact that they are realized within and find their preconditions in a social life, just as independent as their objective sense is of the psychological processes through which their discoverers found them. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 210 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Thought requires deliberate self-distancing because reality resists being understood directly; A thinker’s sources cannot explain the originality of their thought — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 1378; The truth of ideas is independent of their social origins — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 210 (+3 more)

Broader Connections