Jeff Greenberg and Spee Kosloff β Terror Management Theory: Implications for Understanding Prejudice, Stereotyping, Intergroup Conflict, and Political Attitudes
19 published claims from this book.
- Bicultural individuals shift worldviews contextually under death threat
- Charismatic leaders exploit threat to create scapegoats and bring evil into being.
- Culture cannot fully repress death terror, driving people to localize threats in fetishized evil.
- Death concerns strengthen appeals to kill culturally designated evil groups.
- Death reminders uniquely trigger worldview and relationship defense, unlike other aversive threats.
- Humans construct cultural identities to deny mortality.
- Humans deflect death anxiety onto cultural symbols, and defending those symbols produces real-world evil
- Intergroup prejudice and self-esteem serve the same underlying need to deny death.
- Mortality awareness collides with survival instincts to produce existential terror
- Mortality reminders make stereotype targets behave consistently with negative stereotypes of their group.
- Mortality salience can instigate real aggression against critics of oneβs worldview.
- Mortality salience increases stereotypic thinking and preference for stereotype-confirming others.
- Mortality salience increases support for lethal violence against cultural enemies.
- Mortality salience shifts Whitesβ racial-pride and discrimination judgments in favor of their own race.
- Outgroup difference threatens the death-buffering worldview, driving defensive prejudice
- People curb death anxiety by identifying evil with out-groups via scapegoating.
- Prejudice targets are caught between heritage and dominant worldviews, destabilizing meaning.
- Prejudiced targets cope via assimilation, resistance, or pluralism
- Worldview and self-esteem defense is bidirectional with death-thought accessibility.