Brian Christian — The Alignment Problem
68 published claims from this book.
- A curiosity-driven agent can become addicted to novelty like media
- A neuroscience paper founded the field of building mechanical brains
- AI alignment may require machines to pursue human objectives, not their own
- AI assistants will serve two masters and always want something in return
- AI training data is invisible yet permanently shapes deployed system behavior
- Ambiguity in inferred reward functions is usually harmless behaviorally
- An agent should plan around its own future errors, not ideal execution
- Any logical expression can be implemented by a neural network
- Arthur Samuel wrote documentation for typesetting software still in use.
- Autonomous systems become deferential whenever they remain uncertain about user wants
- Behavior is strengthened by satisfying outcomes and weakened by annoying ones
- Bias-correction algorithms can equalize treatment while masking latent power to discriminate
- Blind auditions required removing shoes because footsteps revealed gender
- Children fixate on objects that violate their specific theories
- Children persist with objects that violate their expectations, not merely novel ones.
- Choice of action should hinge on what will actually happen, not ideal possibilities
- Common language carries more gender bias than objective metrics show
- COMPAS assigned higher risk scores to Black defendants who did not reoffend
- COMPAS errors fall unequally on Black and White defendants
- COMPAS misjudged Black and White defendants in systematically opposite ways.
- Complex behavior emerges from rewarding successive small approximations
- Debiasing by marginalization uses all predictors but neutralizes protected variables at prediction time.
- Deployed ML models may stay in production for fifty years
- Design choices optimizing for one task can cripple performance on the real task
- Divided moral theories converge on postponing irreversible cosmic commitments
- Dopamine encodes errors in expectation, not reward or surprise itself
- Each second of cosmic delay forfeits a hundred trillion potential lives
- End-goal-only rewards make learning impractically slow
- Ensuring AI captures human intent is now a central computer science problem
- Even randomly weighted linear models beat human expert judgments
- Every decision is irreversible because time is linear
- Every decision permanently shapes the context of later decisions
- Fairness through blindness is the most robust finding in the field
- Film sensitivity to dark tones was driven by commerce, not civil rights
- Gambling addiction may stem from intrinsic surprise rewards overriding negative expected value.
- Happiness tracks whether things exceed expectations, not how well things actually go
- Human children overimitate even when they see actions are useless
- Hundreds of papers missed blatant sexism in word embeddings
- ImageNet’s three million human-labeled images enabled the deep learning breakthrough
- Imitation learning errors grow quadratically with task scope
- Iterated distillation and amplification can build judgment beyond our own
- Learning is fundamentally the changing of synaptic connections
- Learning reduces uncertainty that is what motivated deference to humans
- Machine learning divides into unsupervised, supervised, and reinforcement learning
- Machines could learn human values by observing behavior instead of being programmed
- Medical staff default to reversible actions when patient wishes are uncertain
- Model opacity makes algorithmic decisions unaccountable in courtrooms
- Models can become true by reshaping reality to fit them
- Objective functions treat all misclassifications as equally costly
- Optimal action under ideal assumptions can be useless under real conditions
- Overimitation grows with the ability to model others’ minds
- Overparameterized value models keep machines obedient at modest cost
- Parole outcomes vary predictably by measurable background factors
- Parole prediction is possible only as aggregate statistics, not certainty
- Partial debiasing can make bias problem worse by hiding it
- Poor performance of control systems can prevent lethal outcomes
- Prior biased policing leaks into race-neutral variables like conviction history
- Privacy rules can prevent engineers from even measuring model bias
- Real neurons proved far messier than the logic-gate model predicted
- Removing protected attributes fails to remove bias from models
- Rewarded actions get stamped in and repeated while punished ones fade
- Self-imitation can bootstrap a machine to superhuman skill
- Sound incentives require losing points when progress is undone
- Systems can learn from shifting their own expectations before final outcomes arrive
- The brain’s all-or-nothing neuron firing resembles binary logic
- Toddlers distinguish deliberate choices from forced actions when imitating
- Training data can encode the beneficial effects of treatment itself
- Untested risk models can detain people on factors having no real predictive value