Words do not label pre-existing political objects but must be made real through interpretation

Evidence

Marsafi’s own purpose was to interpret the ā€˜real meaning’ (haqiqa) of every word he treated, and from there to see that meaning ā€˜realised’ (haqqaqa, tahaqqaqa) in political life. The political world was not a posited object, independent of written language. Words were not labels that simply named and represented political ideas or objects, but interpretations whose force was to be made real. — Timothy Mitchell, Colonising Egypt, 430

Categorization

  • QUESTION: A striking pre-Derridean theory of language from 1880s Cairo — worth verifying whether Marsafi’s haqiqa framework circulated beyond his own lectures.
  • XREF: connects to: Political discourse redefines contested terms so opposition becomes definitionally impossible; Seeking correct definitions is itself politically subversive — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the…, 514; Sublation of the propositional form demands explicit expression, not mere content. (+9 more)