Seeking correct definitions is itself politically subversive

Evidence

Thus, the Socratic discourse is political discourse inasmuch as it contradicts the established political institutions. The search for the correct definition, for the “concept” of virtue, justice, piety, and knowledge becomes a subversive undertaking, for the concept intends a new polis. — Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man, 514

Categorization

  • XREF: The claim that definition-seeking is subversive maps onto attention-economy debates about who controls the definition of ‘good’ or ‘true’ content. — connects to: Organic and political traumas blur because both are blows against meaning — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain…, 4366; Political discourse redefines contested terms so opposition becomes definitionally impossible; Words do not label pre-existing political objects but must be made real through interpretation — Timothy Mitchell, Colonising Egypt, 430 (+7 more)
  • SEED: Article angle: how modern algorithmic definition of ‘relevance’ functions as the flattering of subversive definition-making that Marcuse describes.

Broader Connections