White memoirists reduce black identity to colonial caricatures while erasing their own racial privilege

Evidence

Where Harrison is generous enough to concede the visibility and presence of black people, he still requires them to act within the confines of the ideas that colonialism holds about them. Yet it is important to note that black identities during the colonial era were largely choreographed and performed to ensure survival. Making such a concession is exorbitant for Harrison because it implies encountering black identities and modes of resistance in their complexity. Thus, Harrison stays faithful to the reductionist framing of African people. … The colonial system made sure to set aside such opportunities exclusively for white people. Harrison had the leverage to dream and act on his dreams because he was born on what was considered the correct side of the color line in Rhodesia. In such a context, his work ethic could not only blossom; it was also certain to be noticed and rewarded. — Tavengwa Gwekwerere, Davie E. Mutasa, and Kudakwashe Chitofiri, Settlers, Rhodesians, and Supremacists, 61

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s inquiry into the Rhodesian settler grievance circuit — here showing the self-exculpating narration pattern of the displaced-dominant author. — connects to: Settler values made white authors habitually erase black labor and humanity. — Tavengwa Gwekwerere, Davie E. Mutasa, and Kudakwashe Chitofiri, Settlers, Rhodesians, and Supremacists:…, 51; Black identity is reduced to a catalog of stereotyping colonial caricatures; White women’s linguistic erasure of black women served their own political interests — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 416 (+2 more)

Broader Connections