Weak suppression evidence reinforces rather than weakens conspiracy belief.

Evidence

Though artfully produced, the show’s counterfeit documentary style could scarcely have been expected to fool many. As an Anglia TV spokesman put it, “We felt viewers would be fairly sophisticated about it.” They apparently were not; television and newspaper switchboards were swamped after the broadcast. Anglia found it prudent to sell off the book rights. The 1978 book version, by Leslie Watkins, continued the pretense of factuality. It also reached countries, including the United States, where the broadcast had not been aired. Whenever the book was unavailable, believers attributed its absence to the conspirators’ attempts at suppression. This type of quasiparanoid fear is a particularly strong tendency in the United States. — Michael Barkun, A Culture of Conspiracy, 433

Categorization

  • XREF: Absence-as-suppression reasoning parallels the broader confirmed-bias mechanisms in belief persistence across conspiracy literature. — connects to: Disconfirming evidence can strengthen rather than weaken committed beliefs. — Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste, 97; Superiority claims generate conspiracy theories to explain past defeats — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist…, 203; The more sweeping a conspiracy theory’s claims, the less relevant evidence becomes. — Michael Barkun, A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic…, 93 (+7 more)

Broader Connections