Walmart’s power goes unchallenged partly because it produces its own subjects

Evidence

Were Walmart a state-run monopoly, rather than a staggeringly successful capitalist enterprise, its actions would likely be seen, in sum, as totalitarian. It blends crass populism with incredible material power, a culture of highly torqued securitization with a quasi-theocratic ethos. The fact that Walmart elicits so little resistance cannot simply be reduced to false consciousness, cognitive dissonance or lack of education. Rather, Walmart helps produce the subjects germane to its rule, securitizing souls who ïŹnd in Walmart a temporary ally in a world of systemic and perpetual insecuritization. — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 304

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that corporate power doesn’t just dominate but produces the subjects that acquiesce to it — ‘securitizing souls’ — resists one-sentence summary and reframes resistance itself as symptom. The rejection of false-consciousness explanations is a genuinely paradigm-level move.
  • XREF: Connects to deWaard’s thesis and to the wider financialization-of-culture literature; also echoes Althusserian interpellation and Foucault’s productive power, but applied freshly to retail. — connects to: Walmart’s dominance rests partly on cultural politics of insecurity it also feeds — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 249; Walmart profits by selling simulations of the community order it destroyed — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 300; Walmart’s retail dominance compels cultural producers to self-censor and consolidate production — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 299 (+3 more)

Broader Connections