Veil-scepticism narratives deny Muslim women agency and ignore reverse coercion

Evidence

First, it is seen as oppressive and representative of the presumed inferior position of women in Islam. This narrative relies on denying Muslim women wearing the veil any agency, the presumption being that all women are being forced to wear the veil by male family members. While there will of course be instances where this happens, as Tahira argues, ‘The veil cannot be seen as a black-and-white-issue; each woman who wears it has a different story and I would like to see these women recognized as individuals’ (BBC 2017). Equally, it could be argued that Muslim women are being pressured to remove their veils out of fear of anti-Muslim discrimination or violence. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 561

Categorization

  • XREF: Inverts the liberal ‘oppression’ frame: coercion can equally come from removal, resonating with the modesty-panic article’s argument that dress controls are about power. — connects to: Gendered Muslim stereotypes are mutually constitutive and deny both sexes agency. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 559; The veil ban discourse silences Muslim women’s own autonomous voices — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 167; The hijab-oppresses-women narrative is sexist and contradicts surveyed Muslim women — Arsalan Iftikhar, Fear of a Muslim Planet_ Global
, 373 (+11 more)

Broader Connections