US financialization emerged from state responses to 1970s governance crises.

Evidence

Last, political sociologists place more emphasis on the role of state and explain the rise of finance as an unintended consequence of political responses to the administrative crisis in the 1970s. At the end of postwar prosperity, the US government faced three types of crises, all of which resulted from a mismatch between increasing demands by diverse social groups and shrinking economic resources under government control: increasing tension and conflict between social groups (social crisis), the structural gap between government spending and revenue (fiscal crisis), and declining confidence in government (legitimacy crisis). Krippner (2011) explains that the US government overcame these crises essentially by delegating difficult decisions on prioritizing diverse social Changes may still occur before final publication online and in print Annu. — Gerald F. Davis & Suntae Kim, Financialization of the Economy, 32

Categorization

  • XREF: Matches Krippner’s fiscal-sociology thesis that financialization was not deliberate policy but an unintended by-product of state crisis management. — connects to: Public officials adopt financialization not from ideology but from state incapacities — Ève Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 105; 1970s crises moved business elites to prioritize capital liquidity over employment stability — Ken-Hou Lin & Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Financialization and U.S. Income…, 39; The US economy became increasingly financialized in the post-1970s period. — Greta R. Krippner, The Financialization of the American…, 5 (+7 more)
  • DEFINE: Usefully enumerates the three 1970s US state crises (social, fiscal, legitimacy) in one compact taxonomy.

Broader Connections