Union decline concentrates income at the top

Evidence

These results are consistent with Piketty and Saez’s ư2006ƞ intuition that a labor union might hinder the increase of officers’ share of income, and the decline in union density led to a concentration of income at the top of the distribution. — Ken-Hou Lin & Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Financialization and U.S. Income…, 137

Categorization

  • XREF: Aligns with Piketty and Saez (2006) and the broader top-income concentration literature the reader is tracking in financialization research. — connects to: US unionization dropped from 28 percent of workers to 11 percent since 1955 — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 35; Union decline raises officers’ relative compensation — Ken-Hou Lin & Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Financialization and U.S. Income…, 136; Union density raises both low-level wages and top executive compensation — Ken-Hou Lin & Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Financialization and U.S. Income…, 139 (+2 more)

Broader Connections