Unchecked power over others, not participant nature, drives cruelty

Evidence

And yet, clearly and unambiguously, the orgy of cruelty that took Zimbardo and his colleagues by surprise, stemmed from a vicious social arrangement, and not from the viciousness of the participants. Were the subjects of the experiment assigned to the opposite roles, the overall result would not be different. What mattered was the existence of a polarity, and not who was allocated to its respective sides. What did matter was that some people were given a total, exclusive and untempered power over some other people. If there is a sleeper in each of us, he may remain asleep forever if such a situation does not occur. And then we would never have heard of the sleeper’s existence. β€” Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 475

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The polarity-of-power mechanism as the true source of atrocity β€” role assignment is arbitrary while the power asymmetry is decisive β€” is a dense, paradigm-shifting claim about what produces evil.
  • XREF: connects to: Duty-driven obedience, not personality, predicts cruelty under authority β€” Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 434; Rationalized social organization structurally enables cruelty by mediating responsibility β€” Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 441; Moral inhibition is neutralized by making victims remote and invisible β€” Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 550 (+6 more)

Broader Connections