Uncertainty-reduction strategies induce rather than replace trust.

Evidence

Granovetter would surely argue that these measures “do not produce trust but instead are a functional substitute for it” (1985, p. 489), as he would also suggest about risk spreading and contractual control by principals, described earlier. In contrast, I am arguing that only strategies that virtually eliminate agency and uncertainty are functional substitutes for trust. All efforts to reduce uncertainty-whether through familiarity, reciprocity, threats of sanction, procedural rules, policing, compensatory side bets, or whatever-seek to induce trust. I do not consider personalized control to be all that different from the other measures. — Shapiro, Susan P., The Social Control of Impersonal Trust, 63

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly engages Granovetter’s classic claim that proxies substitute for trust; this is a genuine scholarly disagreement worth tracking against the reader’s trust and social-contract work. — connects to: Reflexive trust can absorb more uncertainty with less risk; Reducing distrust is different from generating trust; Trust reduces complexity by substituting inner certainty for external certainty — Niklas Luhmann, Trust and Power, 154 (+7 more)

Broader Connections