Trust without trustworthiness can lead to destruction rather than complexity reduction

Evidence

Luhmann does not confuse trust and trustworthiness conceptually, because it is genuinely his interest to explain trust, which he supposes is the individual’s device for dealing with complexity—although, of course, the device can work only if others are trustworthy. My own trustworthiness does not directly help me deal with complexity, although it might do so indirectly by begetting trust. On this account, trustworthiness is, in a sense, prior. Hence there is reason to suppose that it is the rise of trustworthiness that allows for the development of complexity, which actually results from successful trust. Trustworthiness not only enables us to handle complexity when we have it, but it also therefore enables us to develop complexity. — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 683 (#qualifies, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Luhmann’s complexity reduction actually depends on trustworthiness, not trust; Trustworthiness precedes and enables societal complexity — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 683; A cheater’s success depends on parasitizing a trustworthy system

Broader Connections