Totalitarian terror requires propaganda to coerce from within

Evidence

See, for instance, E. Kohn-Bramstedt, Dictatorship and Political Police: The Technique of Control by Fear, London, 1945, p. 164 ff. The explanation is that “terror without propaganda would lose most of its psychological effect, whereas propaganda without terror does not contain its full punch” (p. 175). What is overlooked in these and similar statements, which mostly go around in circles, is the fact that not only political propaganda but the whole of modern mass publicity contains an element of threat; that terror, on the other hand, can be fully effective without propaganda, so long as it is only a question of conventional political terror of tyranny. Only when terror is intended to coerce not merely from without but, as it were, from within, when the political regime wants more than power, is terror in need of propaganda. — Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 2598

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • DEFINE: Distinguishes conventional tyranny’s terror (coercion from without, propaganda unnecessary) from totalitarian terror (coercion from within, propaganda essential) — a key toolkit distinction for the biopolitics leg.