The unconscious is a mourning-structure born of lost territory.

Evidence

Animals have no unconscious, because they have a territory. Men have only had an unconscious since they lost a territory. At once territories and metamorphoses have been taken from them - the unconscious is the individual structure of mourning in which this loss is incessantly, hopelessly replayed - animals are the nostalgia for it. The question that they raise for us would thus be this one: don’t we live now and already, beyond the effects of the linearity and the accumulation of reason, beyond the effects of the conscious and unconscious, according to this brute, symbolic mode, of indefinite cycling and reversion over a finite space? — Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation, 455

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Deleuze and Guattari’s deterritorialization/rhizome, which Baudrillard explicitly names here; also resonates with the Jameson postmodern loss-of-depth problematic. — connects to: The unconscious emerges from the loss of territory — Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation, 455; The psychoanalytic Unconscious speaks through coded symptoms about primordial fears of loss; The cerebral unconscious differs fundamentally from the Freudian ego or agency — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain…, 1027 (+6 more)
  • DEFINE: Inverts the standard psychoanalytic definition of the unconscious (repressed buried structure) into a territorial-loss structure, recasting the term.

Broader Connections